Sunday, December 4, 2011

Pumps For Third World Farming

!: Pumps For Third World Farming

It takes my breath away when I see acres upon acres of wheat rolling like a sea of gold. It's a beautiful sight to see a large green patch growing in what used to be a desert. Tourists traveling the world where farming is a large part of the visual and economic landscape stare in awe at the sight of endless fields of corn, soybeans, peanuts, and wheat. What they probably don't stop and think is how all the water got there. During the planting and growing seasons you will see the many different methods of irrigation, as well as fertilizer and chemical application in use. Irrigation and fertilizer application has come a long way in the past century; they are used to help feed an-ever growing and developing world. With sophisticated electronics and computers controlling precise applications water and fertilizer use is efficient and accurate. In many irrigation and chemical application systems there is some pump operated by hydraulic, electric, "nature"-powered (wind or solar) or some other method. Unfortunately, sophisticated systems are not available everywhere they are needed.

Modern agricultural methods have been developed to obtain the highest crop yields possible and produce optimal profit. In parts of the world yield and profits play no part in agricultural development; the goal is to produce enough crops to sustain life. Much of that goal starts with simply moving water from underground or from a river to where it is needed, the field. It's hard to imagine a farm without the means to distribute water where it's needed but it's a big problem in third world counties. Think about how it would be if the only means of getting water to one's crop was through the simplest of pumps; the hand pump. You know, one that requires someone to stand and move a handle up and down until enough pressure is generated to force water from the source through a pipe. In many parts of the world the simple hand pump is still the only means for extracting water from the ground. From the pump, often, the water is placed into a smaller container and carried to the field. The process is being repeated over and over until as many of the crops as possible have been watered. Not the most efficient way to pump and transport water to the area of need.

This is, of course, how it was done in the past but this scenario is still being played out today in many parts of the world. The water source is available, either underground or some distance away from where it is needed, and it would only take a more modern pumping device to bring the water closer. Through the UN, charitable organizations, and many conservation groups, pumps are being made available to people throughout many third world countries. Proper equipment use and conservation methods are being taught daily. With better equipment available to move water from the source to the field the outcome is almost always the same: there is more food available, which means fewer people die of hunger.


Pumps For Third World Farming

Canon Ef-s 60mm 2.8 Macro Usm Lens For Sale

Friday, November 11, 2011

Reverse Osmosis Water Units Are Hard to Beat When You Need One - But, Do YOU Need One?

!: Reverse Osmosis Water Units Are Hard to Beat When You Need One - But, Do YOU Need One?

Years ago, if you knew someone who was dealing with sever water problems, like brackish water, the presence of excessive iron, or the terrible smell of sulfur in their drinking water, you knew how they wanted "something" to deal with it, believe me. And, years ago, they found a good solution in reverse osmosis water units. But, today, if you have stinky water, are on a municipal water system, or a chlorinated well; I've got good news for you. There are far less expensive selective filtration (SF) systems you can get that will do a better job and produce healthier water than reverse osmosis systems. In this article we will look at each system and how they work, and you can decide what's best for you today.

Reverse osmosis (RO) systems work by pushing water against a semi-permeable membrane with pores so small that only objects the size of a water molecule, or smaller, will pass through. As a matter of fact, the pores are so small they will even reject a large part of the water itself along with minerals and most contaminants. In most RO systems, the rejected water is simply wasted. Typically, this amounts to about two or three wasted gallons for every gallon filtered.

The fact that minerals are screened out is why they were so popular with people who were dealing with the things I mentioned above, like iron and sulfur. It is also the reason I implied above that the SF systems will produce healthier water.

Removing ALL the minerals is not a good thing. The body needs some trace minerals like calcium for strong bones and teeth and potassium for regulating the heart. The water become slightly acidic when all the minerals are removed and the acidic water will leach out some of the body's calcium to make calcium carbonate to return to a neutral pH.

Also, health experts also tell us that cancer cells seem to grow only in a slightly acidic environment and, for that reason, they feels there is a long-term health risk associated with drinking demineralized water.

When it comes to synthetic organic chemicals (SOCs), they usually have a smaller molecular structure than water, and will pass right through the membrane. These are compounds like herbicides, pesticides, etc. In order to get the dirty SOCs out of the water, RO systems must be used in combination with a carbon filter.

RO systems requires adequate water pressure to force the water against the membrane and, for some, this may call for the addition of an inline booster pump.

Another requirement of these systems is a storage tank, with a diaphragm to maintain pressure, because most RO systems produce less that one gallon of filtered water per hour. At that rate, without a storage tank, you simply wouldn't have enough clean water for bathing or doing laundry or much of anything else.

All in all, they are bulky units what with the filter, a storage tank, and, maybe, an extra pump. All of this often means more expense, usually requires a plumber and leads to extra maintenance cost somewhere down the line.

For most of us, using an RO system is like using a backhoe to get a little crabgrass out of your yard. Sure, it'll get the job done, but the ensuing pain won't be worth it.

The alternative system, selective filtration, is an excellent choice for any of these problems. It is what I use and I highly recommend it. You can check it out on my website below.

These systems are simple to use but state of the art in technology. As the water passes through them they filter it in stages, first with granulated carbon, then a carbon and multi-media block containing a sub-micron filter along with an ion exchange process.

You simply connect the incoming water line to one end of the filter and the outgoing water line to other end and you're done. No booster pumps, no tanks with diaphragms, no mineral supplements and, if you did it right, no maintenance issues.

It just does its thing, producing good healthy water complete with all the good, healthy minerals that originally came in with the water.

A SF system for your tap will run about 5. The RO system will start around 0.

Whole house SF systems cost under a ,000. The RO systems are put together in stages and will run upwards of ,000.

The bottom line is: chlorine kills. If you in any way doubt that, read my article: "Tap Water Facts-Chlorine in Drinking Water Makes Chickens Cry "Foul"" and, please, don't drink or bathe in chlorinated water on a long term basis.


Reverse Osmosis Water Units Are Hard to Beat When You Need One - But, Do YOU Need One?

Secrets Gpx Karaoke Machine


Twitter Facebook Flickr RSS



Français Deutsch Italiano Português
Español 日本語 한국의 中国简体。